Budgets are Moral Documents!
The religious not-so-right begins to link economic disparity and moral values
February 17, 2005
Staff Sojourners
'A budget that scapegoats the poor and fattens the rich, that
asks for sacrifice mostly from those who can least afford it, is a
moral outrage,' writes Sojourners editor
Jim Wallis in a response to President Bush's 2006 budget
proposal. Agree with that assessment? Sojourners
magazine provides a
simple email
form for people of faith to fill out and send to their
congressperson.
On February 7,
President
Bush unveiled a budget that makes tax cuts from 2001 permanent,
cuts housing and urban development programs by 11%, and slashes
$355 million from 'programs that promote safe and drug-free
schools,' reports Sojourners.
In an article from the April 2004 issue of Sojourners,
Wallis praised University of Alabama law professor Susan Pace
Hamill as a new champion of a just tax system. Hamill's paper,
'An
Argument for Tax Reform based on Judeo-Christian Ethics'
examined Alabama tax code and argued that 'principles of
Judeo-Christian ethics offer moral arguments that complement and
often strengthen secularly based ethical arguments illustrating the
need for social reform.'
Bob Riley, Alabama's conservative Republican governor was
inspired. Beliefnet reported in July 2003 that
Riley
wanted to raise taxes for Alabama's wealthy and cut them for
the poor because, as a Christian, he believed it was the right
thing to do. Later that year, the tax increase made it onto state
ballots as 'Amendment One.' Alabama voters rejected it
overwhelmingly.